Promotions delayed: Converting a merit based system into a discretionary one

B

The promotions of over 300 ‘influential’ bureaucrats, including chairman CDA Maroof Afzal, home secretary Punjab Azam Suleman and acting Pemra chief Kamaluddin Tipu, in grade 20 and 21 have been declared as void by the Islamabad High Court (IHC). The court directed the Establishment Division to resubmit the cases to the authorities concerned after reframing the promotion rules. The bureaucrats whose promotions have been reversed also included Fawad Hassan Fawad, additional secretary Prime Minister’s Secretariat, chairman Punjab chief minister’s inspection team Irfan Ali, additional secretary cabinet division Sikandar Sultan, secretary health Punjab Jawad Malik and additional secretary President Secretariat Shaista Sohail. The court order, however, would not affect those senior bureaucrats who had been promoted “on the basis of seniority and after meeting the required threshold.”At least 64 other bureaucrats filed petitions with the IHC against the promotions, saying despite their eligibility they were denied promotions because of a ‘controversial’ formula the federal government introduced in 2012.The bureaucracy is amongst the few institutions that are supposed to be apolitical. Its members cannot stand for political office or even campaign on behalf of other candidates. While it would be naive to expect the institution to function purely without political influence – especially in Pakistan – the CSB letting go of all standards of impartiality, is deplorable, even by the warped standards of corruption and nepotism in this country. Before 2012 promotions to senior positions were made on an impartial assessment agenda. Experience, seniority, reputation, performance evaluation reports (PERs) and training evaluation reports (TERs) all contributed to a score out of 100. Those above 75 were eligible for promotion. In the newly administered formula, 85 is the par score and the CSB has the authority to award discretionary marks; effectively vetoing those it doesn’t favour (mostly those who do not have the right political connections). It is remarkable how easily the PML-N government converted a merit based system to a discretionary one, despite claims from the Prime Minister himself that the bureaucracy was to remain impartial. It is a testament to the unfairness of the system that at least 64 other bureaucrats filed petitions with the IHC against the promotions, saying that despite their eligibility they were denied promotions because of the ‘controversial’ formula set by the federal government.The IHC has declared the whole system illegal, and asked the CSB to resubmit the cases after amending the promotion rules, and one hopes under the whip of the judiciary the CSB acts in a fair manner. Political favouritism – as frowned upon as it is – is forgiven to an extent in the legislature or the affairs of the cabinet, but it must not be allowed to even shadow the bureaucracy.
pk.shafaqna.com

Share This Article