2Shafaqna Pakistan: Nearly four decades passed since the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran which was an ideological revolution.
It was clear that it’s not going to be restricted within the geographical boundaries. Its theories had a fresh global discourse and new literature.
It had a great impact to the extent that the West launched an Iranphobia scenario and tried to change the concepts of the Iranian Revolution and to prevent the spread of its Iranian version.
In all these decades, whenever a feeling of people’s victory and Islamic resistance was felt in every regional political event, it has always been tried to accuse Iran of being involved as a third party.
It can easily be understood that Iran’s revolutionary discourse have impact on regional developments and create doubts in Arab political structures along with intellectual and political maturity of influential groups in Islamic societies are the main reasons that Iran has always been accused by the anti-Iranian axis.
Some of these allegations raised at a time when the power of resistance movements influenced by Iran was increasing and they were moving forward rapidly in political field and in battle field. The main goal is to curb popular movements with the Islamic resistance approach in Iran.
Accusing Iran of sending arms and of supporting terrorism is exactly the result of inability to stop the spread of Islamic resistance role model among the people of the region and to find a way to slow down the growing momentum of the resistance axis.
If a popular revolution is formed in Bahrain, Iran will be accused of interfering, immediately! When the Iraqis are advancing in the battle field, Iran is accused!
When ISIS is defeated in Syria, Iran is criticized. Iran is accused of the 33-day Lebanon war and the 22-day Gaza. Every time the Israelis are relieved of the treatment of security challenges, Iran is in the middle.
Iran is always considered the prime suspect in all crises? While second suspects that are Arab nations only want to experience Iran’s political independence.
The concern is understandable. Iran is everywhere. Iran’s aid to al-Aqsa mosque, the depth of Israeli security and the Islamic priority, is being distributed. The version of Iran’s revolution is repeated in Yemen. The role model of Iran’s revolution led to the establishment of Hashd al-Shaabi in Iraq and organized popular forces in Syria. If these models were not formed, Syria would be torn apart between ISIS and 250 other terrorist groups in the first place.
Americans launch a costly war in Iraq hopping to reach a political and economic influence. But it is Iran that the Iraqis love.
US-led coalition was formed to combat terrorism, but it is Iran that share victories with the people of Iraq, Syria and Lebanon for defeating ISIS.
It should be asked that whether this is a strong point or weakness? Iran is present in all developments, not military presence but spiritual, is it a weakness or an allegation?
Those who put the blames on Iran must know that Iran’s discourse has triumphed over Saudi and American oil dollars and military warships not sending multiple cargo of weapons!
It should be asked if Iran really did send weapons to Yemen and Bahrain, wouldn’t it changed the outcome of the war?
If the allegation means the ideology and discourse of the Iranian revolution had impact on movement of Islamic nations and make Arab governments concern over facing any change in nations’ attitude, we are pleased to welcome.
Iran’s influence is not a compulsory process, it is a choice made by the people.
The thing that Iran could send weapons to Yemen through Kuwait is the latest scenario that Reuters is its executive and contractor. If Reuters’ managers had a little knowledge about the geology of the region, they would realized that sending arms to Yemen through Kuwait that must cross the border of Saudi Arabia has two messages:
-Iran is basically unable to do so, that shows it is a false claim and it is in conflict with professional media ethics so they should apologize.
-If Iran was able to really do that, it shows that Iran is the superior security and intelligence and military power and Saudis were incapable of controlling their borders. It should be said that the king of Saudi Arabia governs only within the geographic area of Riyadh!
Iran does not need to spend a lot. The promotion of Iranian discourse has led to the strengthening of the resistance axis everywhere. Discourse does not require permission to cross the political and geographical boundaries, it finds its way to the hearts and minds of Islamic nations.